We performed a comparison between RadView WebLOAD and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
"The solution is simple and useful."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."
"There is no analytical dashboard."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"The price is reasonable, but it's not the best."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its scalability."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The interface should be made attractive."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
RadView WebLOAD is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 9 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process but the reporting is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and k6 Open Source, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.