We performed a comparison between Redgate SQL Toolbelt and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to track the reports, this is what is most valuable for me."
"The most valuable feature is SQL Search."
"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."
"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database. If you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster. It works on common commodity hardware. You can use any type of server. You don't need to have proprietary hardware. It's fairly flexible."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"The parallel load features mean that Greenplum is capable of high-volume data loading in parallel to all of the cluster segments, which is really valuable."
"I would like to see the bandwidth increase allowing me to easily analyze more data."
"The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"Tanzu Greenplum's compression for GPText could be made more efficient."
"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The user interface could be improved."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
Earn 20 points
Redgate SQL Toolbelt is ranked 8th in Database Development and Management while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 7th in Database Development and Management with 81 reviews. Redgate SQL Toolbelt is rated 8.0, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Redgate SQL Toolbelt writes "SQL Search and change automation functionality help us manage our code repository and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Redgate SQL Toolbelt is most compared with Quest Spotlight, DBmaestro Database Source Control, IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server, SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and ActiveMQ. See our Redgate SQL Toolbelt vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
