We performed a comparison between SCOM and ThousandEyes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The solution primarily drives system information, and I believe it works fine."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"SCOM has helped us to monitor all the VMs in our environment, especially the Windows servers."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is real-time alerts."
"ThousandEyes gives companies better visibility."
"It's fairly easy to set up."
"The company provides excellent service."
"From our perspective, ThousandEyes stands out as an invaluable tool because of its deep and extensive capabilities."
"The authentication overall - including to the VPN and LAN - is excellent."
"The installation process is not hard at all."
"The most valuable features are integration and ease of use."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"SCOM's feature that notifies us when a server is down is not present in recent updates, which has weakened the product."
"I would like more customized reports. People should have some customization option on the dashboards for whenever they put multiple lists into it. Beyond customizing the content, there should be the ability to customize the colors so that they can engage some priority and mark challenges separately."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"The management of the servers could be better."
"SCOM needs to improve its usability."
"It might be practical to extend monitoring capabilities to include network devices"
"It would be nice if the solution covered other areas like server monitoring."
"There is room for improvement in terms of customization and user-friendliness."
"It's an expensive solution."
"They only offer synthetic requests."
"The tool does not provide features for application-level monitoring."
"I would like the product to offer more agility."
"ThousandEyes could improve the dashboards by adding more features."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews while ThousandEyes is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while ThousandEyes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThousandEyes writes "Reliable. simple to set up, and offers fast monitoring capabilities". SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas ThousandEyes is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Accedian Skylight, SolarWinds NPM, Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our SCOM vs. ThousandEyes report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.