We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the self-updating engine."
"Nessus gives me a good preview of vulnerabilities and good suggestions for remediation. It's easy to find a description of a given vulnerability and solutions for it."
"I like this solution because it is complete. It can scan and check many types of vulnerabilities. It can also check for compliance."
"I have found the vulnerability assessment and the reports to be useful."
"Among the most valuable features are scanning for vulnerabilities and the reporting. The reporting templates are okay. I like that I can see all the hosts with different vulnerabilities."
"Quick assessments, compliance scores, and results are provided without having to do agents."
"It also has an executive report where you don't have to provide the client all the detail for them to sift though. But if they wish to dig through the detail they can."
"I am impressed with the tool's vulnerability scanning."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The report for counters is too simple and would be improved by a dashboard."
"I would like to have a management option after the network scanning."
"Pricing is one of the most important features, and it is something that they can improve on."
"Some things in the user interface could be better. The user interface could allow more adjustments to plugins. The price could also be better."
"The reports are okay, but the interface is a bit difficult to navigate in some cases."
"Tenable Nessus could improve the price."
"This is still a maturing product. Tenable is only a scanner for one ability, while other solutions like Rapid7 have more tools for verification. We still have to manually verify to see if the vulnerability is a false positive or not."
"From my point of view the solution basically is not for the big enterprise."
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Rapid7 InsightVM and Black Kite, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Pentera.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.