We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Wiz based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector features an informative user interface and support for ISO certification checks. Wiz users like the user-friendly dashboards and risk prioritization. Users say SUSE NeuVector could be improved by expanding its scanning capabilities to include IaaS and virtual machines and easier integration. On the other hand, Wiz should focus on improving log integrations and reporting capabilities. Reviewers also want more visibility into EKS and Kubernetes containers.
Service and Support: SUSE NeuVector users value assistance from their support team, who are described as helpful and knowledgeable. However, some users said the overall process is complicated. Wiz customers commend the excellent support and accessible representatives. They also appreciate the strong post-sales support offered by Wiz.
Ease of Deployment: Users have reported mixed experiences with the initial setup of SUSE NeuVector, with some finding it to be complex and challenging. The initial setup of Wiz is considered to be straightforward and quick.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector charges annual licensing fees, and it's considered cheaper than other solutions. Wiz provides a straightforward pricing structure. However, some were concerned about possible price fluctuations, and other users find Wiz to be pricier than alternatives.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is beneficial for high-risk industries like financial services, while Wiz offers immediate advantages like improved asset management and vulnerability identification. Additionally, Wiz provides continuous value with new features and centralized investigations.
Comparison Results: SUSE NeuVector is preferred over Wiz because of its extensive features, informative user interface, and support for multiple clusters. It excels in performance, deployment, and cost.
"The offensive security feature is valuable because it publicly detects the offensive and vulnerable things present in our domain or applications. It checks any applications with public access. Some of the applications give public access to certain files or are present over a particular domain. It detects and lets us know with evidence. That is quite good. It is protecting our infrastructure quite well."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Wiz is ranked 2nd in Container Security with 12 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Wiz is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wiz writes "Multiple features help us prioritize remediation, and agentless implementation reduces overhead". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Trivy, whereas Wiz is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS Security Hub and Lacework. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Wiz report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.