Trellix Network Detection and Response vs VMRay comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Trellix Logo
1,917 views|1,335 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
VMRay Logo
213 views|154 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and VMRay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline.""We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment.""The installation phase was easy.""Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams.""It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye.""Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening.""We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up.""It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

"IP tracing is the most valuable feature."

More VMRay Pros →

Cons
"It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning.""The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless.""As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web).""It is an expensive solution.""Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.""The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required.""Technical support could be improved.""If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

"The technical support needs improvement."

More VMRay Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is overly priced."
  • More VMRay Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less… more »
    Top Answer:The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless. STG needs to... I'm not sure what their roadmap is; they've… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,917
    Comparisons
    1,335
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    213
    Comparisons
    154
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    VMRay is focused on a single mission: to help enterprises protect themselves against the growing global malware threat. The company’s automated malware analysis and detection solutions help enterprises around the world minimize business risk, protect their valuable data and safeguard their brand. VMRay’s founders, Dr. Carsten Willems and Dr. Ralf Hund, were early pioneers in malware sandboxing, developing breakthrough technologies that continue to lead the industry. They founded VMRay to transform their research into practical solutions for making the online world a safer place. Learn more: www.vmray.com

    Sample Customers
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    National Bank of Canada, Carbon Black, Cloudmark, Cyberint, Expel, G Data Advanced Analytics, Jisc
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews while VMRay is ranked 27th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 1 review. Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4, while VMRay is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMRay writes "Has a valuable IP tracing feature, but is an expensive solution". Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Vectra AI, whereas VMRay is most compared with Cuckoo Sandbox, Joe Sandbox Ultimate, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiSandbox and VirusTotal.

    See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.