We performed a comparison between TruView and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"The most valuable feature is monitoring."
"The integration capabilities and APIs are the best part."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"Health and communication links availability."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."
"Improvement is needed as per customer requirements."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"The performance reporting could be improved."
"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. TruView is rated 9.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our TruView vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.