We performed a comparison between 3i Infotech ORION and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The three most crucial pieces are the financial modules, the banking module, and the management module."
"I have found the solution has many valuable features such as a user-friendly mobile platform, notification settings, and the ability to do many customizations."
"The tool's usability is straightforward."
"A stable and solid product."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The product can scale."
"The build-in dashboard and reporting customization should be improved."
"The reporting Module should be improved and a drag and drop functionality should be added."
"Improvements could be made regarding user-friendliness and transitioning fully to a web version. Features like forex reconciliation and a cash flow planning module could enhance the solution."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is more of a legacy solution because most of the competitors are or have moved to the cloud. It would be beneficial if there was a cloud version available. Additionally, the interface could improve."
3i Infotech ORION is ranked 21st in ERP with 4 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. 3i Infotech ORION is rated 7.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 3i Infotech ORION writes "Helps us to do spreadsheet reports on sales and quotations and provides donor reports for projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". 3i Infotech ORION is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.