We performed a comparison between 3i Infotech ORION and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The three most crucial pieces are the financial modules, the banking module, and the management module."
"I have found the solution has many valuable features such as a user-friendly mobile platform, notification settings, and the ability to do many customizations."
"The tool's usability is straightforward."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"A stable and solid product."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The reporting Module should be improved and a drag and drop functionality should be added."
"The build-in dashboard and reporting customization should be improved."
"Improvements could be made regarding user-friendliness and transitioning fully to a web version. Features like forex reconciliation and a cash flow planning module could enhance the solution."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is more of a legacy solution because most of the competitors are or have moved to the cloud. It would be beneficial if there was a cloud version available. Additionally, the interface could improve."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
3i Infotech ORION is ranked 21st in ERP with 4 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. 3i Infotech ORION is rated 7.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 3i Infotech ORION writes "Helps us to do spreadsheet reports on sales and quotations and provides donor reports for projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". 3i Infotech ORION is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.