CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Microsoft Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] and Microsoft Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: February 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unranked
In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: February 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
Bhold Forefront Identity Manager, MS Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL]
Learn More
Overview
CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.
Microsoft Forefront Identity Manager (FIM 2010) enables organizations to manage the entire lifecycle of user identities and their associated credentials. It can be configured to synchronize identities, centrally manage certificates and passwords, and provision users across heterogeneous systems. With FIM IT organizations can define and automate the processes used to manage identities from creation to retirement.
Sample Customers
Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
Ministry of Health (MoH) in Saudi Arabia, Vocational Training Council, PKP S.A., Arysta LifeScience, Wiltshire Council, Sats Elixia, MANN+HUMMEL Group, ViveICA, Kotak Group, Sun International, Anel
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise44%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise38%
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
February 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: February 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Microsoft Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM). CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL] is rated 7.4. On the other hand, CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Bhold Forefront Identity Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.