We performed a comparison between RSA SecurID Access and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The compliance features are the most valuable features."
"The initial setup isn't so difficult."
"Access certification and provisioning are two of the solutions most valuable features."
"The solution is one of the main security products you need to control access and have visibility into what's happening in your organization. It helps with managing access to applications, ensuring governance, and obtaining certifications."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"It is a scalable product."
"The support is very good."
"The first valuable feature of the solution is its interface. The second feature of the solution is the level of flexibility it provides."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"There is a need for further enhancements, specifically in the multifactor authentication capabilities."
"The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great. In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added."
"The solution's technical support team's response time and skills need improvement since it is an area where there are shortcomings."
"The product must improve its support."
"When it comes to queries and analysis, I find the reporting module to be very low, very simple."
"What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security."
"Scalability is hard, especially when you are doing it in real time."
"Some setups should be done in the interface and in the code, and could be made simpler."
RSA SecurID Access is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 60 reviews. RSA SecurID Access is rated 7.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RSA SecurID Access writes "Enhanced security, reliable, helpful technical support, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". RSA SecurID Access is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, PingID, Fortinet FortiToken and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.