We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"It scales well. You can either have it working in with the databases, or you can move it outside. It's got the ability to parallelize up, so you can certainly extract and replay the data from your databases in parallel. So it does have horizontal scalability. That is probably one of its stronger features, the ability just to automatically parallelize the replay and playing of data to allow to scale to large volumes."
"You can put data together from a few databases into one database or the other way, from one database into several. It transforms data in real-time."
"The product is reliable for data integrity."
"It allows us to migrate from one system to another, from one server to another, with no downtime, no outage. We can get the data synchronized with multiple databases and then switch the connectivity across to the new servers."
"The live application feature is most valuable. The solution is stable. I rate it a seven out of ten."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"For small databases, GoldenGate handles the migration well."
"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"The GoldenGate license is very costly."
"What needs improvement in Oracle GoldenGate is the support. Another feature that needs to be improved in the solution is its GUI. It would be useful for programmers or users to be able to work from the GUI, not just from the command line. Simplifying how Oracle GoldenGate is used would also make the solution better."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
"You cannot put everything in Golden Gate for the license and large models."
"The solution needs to improve its latency, monitoring and support."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
Earn 20 points
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.