We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The replication of the data table is one of the best features."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"The solution's existing SaaS platform for data integration gives us an edge."
"Since the world is going towards open source, the solution's heterogeneous data migration feature is very useful."
"This solution has a well-known procedure for troubleshooting and tuning the performance, providing for smooth operation."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"In the future, I would appreciate a more user-friendly monitoring interface for easier management and troubleshooting."
"The main problem of Oracle GoldenGate is that sometimes, the processes get abended. Data consistency is also challenging."
"IBM CDC has one central control while Oracle GoldenGate has two controls. In IBM CDC we can do all things in frontend. The solution needs to incorporate a feature where we can connect it to a standby database."
"We struggle with memory. It's limited. However, it may be because of our unique business case and how we use it that it's limiting for us."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"The solution's licensing price is very expensive and could be made more competitive."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
Earn 20 points
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI).
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.