Adobe CQ5 vs TerminalFour Site Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Sanjeev_Gupta
Ranking
9th
Views
564
Comparisons
474
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
Views
184
Comparisons
164
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
CQ5
Site Manager
Learn More
Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals.
Sample Customers
Boehringer Ingelheim
University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company14%
Construction Company9%
Retailer9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available

Adobe CQ5 is ranked 9th in Web Content Management while TerminalFour Site Manager is ranked 19th in Web Content Management. Adobe CQ5 is rated 10.0, while TerminalFour Site Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Adobe CQ5 writes "Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TerminalFour Site Manager writes "TerminalFour Site Manager Review". Adobe CQ5 is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, whereas TerminalFour Site Manager is most compared with WordPress.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.