We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and ASP.NET based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"The UI is really good."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"The solution has good scalability."
"ASP.NET is stable. I did not have to do any maintenance on it."
"The developer support for ASP.NET is a big positive. It's actually very good, and since there are so many people who use ASP.NET, it's easy to get responses to questions about ASP.NET in the broader community."
"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."
"We use ASP.NET to develop web applications and web API. I'm working at a government financial institution in Mexico that helps citizens buy a house"
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"The caching could improve in ASP.NET. I don't often run into limitations with ASP.NET. More often, it's the other tools we use that slow us down."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"ASP.NET is not the best solution for all companies looking to implement a solution like it."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."
"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."
"In addition to the visual aspect, there is a need for ASP.NET to provide a robust visual front end like there was in the past."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while ASP.NET is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.