We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and ASP.NET based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"The UI is really good."
"The main pro is that it's very easy and we have Microsoft helping to stabilize the product which is coming with the all new features every year."
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is the support of multiple platforms with ASP.NET Core. Additionally, Azure integrates well with ASP.NET and Visual Studio."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."
"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"I'd like to be able to run any application from a specific point instead of compiling all the code. For example, if I want to test function A, I should be able to test it even if my other functions aren't working. Like in SQL, you provide parameters to the function, and it executes. I'd like to see something similar in ASP.NET."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while ASP.NET is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.