We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and ASP.NET based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"The UI is really good."
"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"One of the most valuable features in ASP.NET is thread management with asynchronous processing. I've been implementing this for a few years and it has proven to be extremely helpful, especially when using a tool that wouldn't have worked without it. It's definitely a fundamental aspect of the platform."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."
"The main pro is that it's very easy and we have Microsoft helping to stabilize the product which is coming with the all new features every year."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"The solution is very easy to maintain because UI management is simple and many libraries are available."
"ASP.NET's best features are its application structure and API testing."
"The solution has good scalability."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"The caching could improve in ASP.NET. I don't often run into limitations with ASP.NET. More often, it's the other tools we use that slow us down."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"It would be beneficial if Microsoft provided more support for certain technologies, such as Blazor, in the form of basic components. As it stands, some reliance on third-party tools may be necessary. Having more support from Microsoft for these technologies would make it easier for users to build and maintain applications. For example, the grids, date pickers, and dropdown lists would be components to add."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while ASP.NET is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
