We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"The UI is really good."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"Microsoft Visual Studio is a must-have tool if you work in Windows environments."
"Microsoft Visual Studio is stable and the performance was good. However, if you do not have decent hardware you will not have the same experience."
"It is a straightforward solution to set up."
"One of the most valuable features is its support. It's easy for me to get support even though I never use it. If there's a bug or a performance issue, Microsoft also provides quick updates, and this is another valuable feature of the program."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the way we are able to design code, deploy, and test our application. It is easy to move an artifact from the start to the deployment stage. It has well-defined processes that you can integrate with any team. Additionally, the solution is always improving."
"The valuable feature is that it provides a basic template for everything and built-in debugging tools. They definitely save me time."
"I have found that it is scalable."
"It is definitely sophisticated and provides many out-of-the-box features. Going community has boosted all that."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"Sometimes, the deprecation of packages can be a challenge."
"Microsoft Visual Studio needs to improve integration."
"The migration could improve in Microsoft Visual Studio. When I upgraded from 2017 and up to 2022 it was not smooth. There was a lot of manual hand-picking. Microsoft should put a higher budget for the database developers' section in Visual Studio."
"The product could be improved by including axle intelligence."
"Microsoft Visual Studio can improve integration with the Microsoft Office suite; this was only implemented in 2022."
"Every time it updates, there are issues."
"It would be great if they added some extra support for other languages that are available in the market and prepared it for the, let's say, crypto developers as we are going in the age of cryptocurrency."
"We'd like the solution to be more secure."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our Adobe Flash vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
