We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"The UI is really good."
"It is a stable solution."
"Notably, the Enterprise version facilitates seamless integration with Microsoft products, leveraging the ease of connectivity within the Microsoft ecosystem."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is how easy it is to access all the basic templates for development. There are so many features you get with Visual Studio that it's really helpful for the deployment, the development, and the intelligence behind it."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is its integration with Azure DevOps."
"The product integrates well with Azure Cloud, and it supports a ton of languages."
"This solution can integrate with almost any functionality offered by Microsoft."
"Most valuable features include code navigation by symbols and document auto formatting."
"We like Visual Studio because you can choose the different types of languages, like JavaScript. I think it's better than the other solutions I used."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"Despite its advantages, challenges in diverse cloud environments may prompt the uninstallation of the application or entire development environment for resolution."
"It is simple to use for most developers and nearly impossible to use for non-developers."
"Every time it updates, there are issues."
"The solution is not really good at debugging JavaScript, jQuery, or SQL"
"Microsoft should add more visualization for analytical studies or research."
"Since it is a heavy product, it is somewhat slow in building and executing the code in a localhost environment and it consumes a lot of resources."
"The solution must provide user-friendly features."
"There could be more coding languages in the solution."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our Adobe Flash vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
