We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."
"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."
"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."
"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."
"The UI is really good."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is its integration with Azure DevOps."
"It is a straightforward solution to set up."
"We can use different .NET features."
"The valuable feature is that it provides a basic template for everything and built-in debugging tools. They definitely save me time."
"The tool is good for interactive testing. It has good integrations and works well for remote services. The product also has features for collaborative work where it allows others to control my screen. It has a good community for every language."
"Visual Studio's best feature is debugging, which isn't available with any other Microsoft development tool."
"The code analysis tool is particularly valuable as it eliminates the need for manual code reviews."
"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."
"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."
"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."
"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."
"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."
"There are some features that I have yet to explore and it would be helpful to have more information about what is available and how it works."
"Every time it updates, there are issues."
"The interface is slow to start up."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
"Visual Studio Team System needs to improve documentation."
"Could be improved with the ability to personalize the interface and development style and to edit extension requirements."
"I would like to have more integration with other platforms and technologies."
"Microsoft Visual Studio could improve by being compatible with more operating systems. However, we understand the solution is proprietary to Microsoft."
Adobe Flash is ranked 4th in .NET Development Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. Adobe Flash is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Flash writes "Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". Adobe Flash is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight and Adobe AIR, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our Adobe Flash vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.