We compared AirMagnet Survey and Ekahau Site Survey based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
AirMagnet Survey offers efficient network optimization, reliable support, positive ROI, reasonable pricing, and positive user experiences. Users suggest improvements in functionality and integration. In comparison, Ekahau Site Survey provides detailed coverage mapping, positive ROI, efficient troubleshooting capability, responsive customer service, competitive pricing, and positive user experiences. Users highlight the need for enhancements in the user interface, reporting capabilities, and mapping accuracy.
Features: The valuable features of AirMagnet Survey include accurate Wi-Fi signal mapping, network interference detection and resolution, comprehensive reporting options, user-friendly interface, spectrum analysis, and heatmapping functionalities. Meanwhile, Ekahau Site Survey offers accurate and detailed Wi-Fi coverage mapping, thorough analysis of signal strength and interference, an intuitive interface, network performance simulation, optimized access point placement, efficient troubleshooting, and reliable reporting.
Pricing and ROI: The setup costs for AirMagnet Survey and Ekahau Site Survey have received positive feedback from users. AirMagnet Survey offers a straightforward and user-friendly installation process, while Ekahau Site Survey is mentioned as smooth and seamless. Users have found the licensing options for both products to be flexible and easy to manage., The ROI for AirMagnet Survey has been positive, with users reporting improved network performance, reduced costs, enhanced productivity, and improved customer satisfaction. Similarly, Ekahau Site Survey has shown positive ROI with significant improvements in network planning, troubleshooting, reduced downtime, optimized network performance, increased productivity, and cost savings.
Room for Improvement: AirMagnet Survey users have highlighted the need for enhancements in functionality, ease of use, accuracy, comprehensive reporting features, and integration with other tools. Meanwhile, Ekahau Site Survey users suggest improving the software's user interface, reporting capabilities, and mapping accuracy and precision.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration for establishing a new tech solution with AirMagnet Survey varies greatly among users. Some users took three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, while others only required a week for both phases. On the other hand, user feedback for Ekahau Site Survey indicates that some users took three weeks for deployment and two days for setup, while others needed a month for deployment and an extra week for setup. The experiences with Ekahau Site Survey also varied, with some users taking longer periods for both phases and others requiring less time., Users of AirMagnet Survey highly praise its customer service for its prompt and helpful assistance. The support team is professional and knowledgeable, providing exceptional service. On the other hand, Ekahau Site Survey provides prompt and helpful assistance as well, with its support team being responsive and experts in providing effective solutions.
The summary above is based on 17 interviews we conducted recently with AirMagnet Survey and Ekahau Site Survey users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It is reliable and easy to use (user-friendly). The heat mapping, passive network surveying, and doing the heat mapping of a building's wireless network allows me to see what level of coverage an area has."
"The predictive survey is the most valuable feature. I use it quite often."
"The heat maps are quite good, and some features are easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the predictive survey. The antennas' RF patterns are reflected correctly on the drawing when preparing predictive heat maps."
"The most valuable features are the survey, spectrum analysis, and reporting."
"The addition of the AirMapper software on the nXG and our AirCheck G2s has helped a lot because we're mostly not drilling down into the data. Local managers only need to see the coverage on their end and whether there are performance bottlenecks. These things are easy enough for us to ascertain with iPerf."
"I would like to rate the product as eight of ten."
"We use the solution for Wi-Fi and networks."
"The troubleshooting tools are the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The planning feature is useful because it's very affordable."
"The most valuable features of the Ekahau Site Survey for us are the combination of using the tool."
"The ability to perform dual-band spectrum analysis while conducting the standard WiFi site survey is a tremendous time saver."
"I have found the most valuable feature is the RF interference and integration capabilities."
"Ekahau Site Survey is user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution."
"Ekahau Site Survey is scalable."
"I would say some of our newer techs that are going out to job sites can be a little bit intimidated by the interface."
"But it's definitely a more expensive solution than other ones."
"The surveying features are in need of improvement, along with general usability."
"It would be nice to have some more training resources for younger techs. We can use them if we need some assistance, but that usually requires one of us who knows what we're doing to calibrate the programs properly."
"Less time consumed doing the real surveys."
"It'd be nice if it was cheaper, however, you get value for your money."
"AirMagnet Survey doesn't cover certain devices in the system."
"The user interface needs a lot of improvement. The auto-placement of access points is not accurate."
"Ekahau Site Survey is an expensive solution, and its pricing should be improved."
"It would be better if it provided clear visibility. It would be better if it accommodated large physical sites like a warehouse with a ceiling height of more than twelve to fifteen feet. In such situations, we were unable to provide better coverage."
"The report generation has room for improvement and is missing small details."
"The new Sidekick is going to support Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E."
"The support is an area in need of improvement."
"I would say that the indoor site accuracy is pretty good but the outdoor one should be improved. I would say if there was a way to put trees in there and canopies, that would be great."
"I find the power button hard to access with just one hand."
"I am having problems importing maps to Ekahau Site Survey. Importing is one of the first steps in using the solution and it is getting stuck. The problem could be that our maps are large with many layers."
AirMagnet Survey is ranked 2nd in Network Modeling and Simulation with 38 reviews while Ekahau Site Survey is ranked 1st in Network Modeling and Simulation with 30 reviews. AirMagnet Survey is rated 8.2, while Ekahau Site Survey is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AirMagnet Survey writes "It fixes so many problems quickly that we don't regret spending more on high-end tools than most companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ekahau Site Survey writes "Valuable troubleshooting tools and easy to scale, but outdated documentation, issues with stability, and lacks differentiated survey modes". AirMagnet Survey is most compared with Aruba Wireless, AirCheck G3, iBwave Wi-Fi, Ubiquiti WLAN and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Ekahau Site Survey is most compared with iBwave Wi-Fi, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and RedSeal. See our AirMagnet Survey vs. Ekahau Site Survey report.
See our list of best Network Modeling and Simulation vendors.
We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
