Allot NetEnforcer [EOL] vs Juniper WXC [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Allot NetEnforcer [EOL] and Juniper WXC [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
WXC
Learn More
Juniper
Video Not Available
Overview

Deliver Applications and Quality of Experience (QoE)

Allot NetEnforcer comprises a series of high-performance, purpose-built appliances for monitoring and managing data traffic in enterprise, cloud and broadband service provider networks. With speeds scaling from 20Mbps to 16Gbps, these platforms provide granular visibility, policy enforcement, and service integration in a wide range of networks. Allot NetEnforcer platforms are powered by our Dynamic Actionable Recognition Technology (DART) engine, which identifies more applications and protocols than any other product in the market, and is kept up to date via frequent, hitless updates.

Support real-time traffic steering to ensure value-added services

Allot NetEnforcer platforms support real-time traffic steering and are fully integrated with our constantly growing portfolio of value-added services to enable a wide range of solutions and use cases. With the visibility, control, performance, and service integration provided by Allot NetEnforcer, you can ensure critical application delivery and user quality of experience when and where it matters.

- See more at: http://www.allot.com/products/...

Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Cubix, University of Bath, NSSL
AARNet Pty Ltd, BancABC, Catholic Health System, Cloud Dynamics, DQE Communications, Expedient, Global Investment Bank, HEAnet, Hosting, London Internet Exchange Ltd (LINX), Massachusetts Broadband Institute, High Performance Networks Inc., Meijer, MercaSID, S.A., Multinational Financial Services Provider, Neutrona, Nevada Health CO-OP, Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC), Revlon Inc., Springfield Public Schools (SPS), St. Catherine University, University of Hertfordshire, Valdosta State University, zulily
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Allot NetEnforcer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Juniper WXC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. Allot NetEnforcer [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Juniper WXC [EOL] is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper WXC [EOL] writes "Compression, acceleration & mulit-path are valuable, however look at alternatives as the Juniper WXC is end-of-sale". Allot NetEnforcer [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Juniper WXC [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.