Amazon EMR vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,149 views|1,834 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Cloudera Logo
2,959 views|2,278 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EMR and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EMR vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward.""Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data.""When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark.""In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance.""The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data.""Amazon EMR's most valuable features are processing speed and data storage capacity.""We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."

More Amazon EMR Pros →

"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable.""Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis.""The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized.""It is helpful to gather and process data.""I don't see any performance issues.""The data science aspect of the solution is valuable.""CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools.""The product provides better data processing features than other tools."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pros →

Cons
"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions.""The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit.""Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance.""The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly.""The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users.""There is no need to pay extra for third-party software.""The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better.""Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

More Amazon EMR Cons →

"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult.""Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions.""We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there is a lot of things that need to improve.""It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform.""The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better.""The solution is not fit for on-premise distributions.""Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment.""While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."
  • "The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • "Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."
  • "There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."
  • "There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
  • "Amazon EMR is not very expensive."
  • "The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
  • More Amazon EMR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "When comparing with Oracle Sybase and SQL, it's cheaper. It's not expensive."
  • "The price could be better for the product."
  • "I haven't bought a license for this solution. I'm only using the Apache license version."
  • "Cloudera requires a license to use."
  • "Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is expensive, with support costs involved."
  • "I wouldn't recommend CDH to others because of its high cost."
  • "The price is very high. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data.
    Top Answer:As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data.
    Top Answer:The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable.
    Top Answer:The tool is expensive. Overall, it's not a cheap software tool, and that is why only large enterprises who are mature enough and have an architecture that is complex enough opt for Cloudera, as its… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's ability to be deployed on a cloud model is an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool works very well when deployed on an on-premises model. The deployment on a cloud… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,149
    Comparisons
    1,834
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.8
    2nd
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,959
    Comparisons
    2,278
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic MapReduce
    Learn More
    Overview
    Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR) is a web service that makes it easy to quickly and cost-effectively process vast amounts of data. Amazon EMR simplifies big data processing, providing a managed Hadoop framework that makes it easy, fast, and cost-effective for you to distribute and process vast amounts of your data across dynamically scalable Amazon EC2 instances.
    Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is the world's most complete, tested, and popular distribution of Apache Hadoop and related projects. CDH is 100% Apache-licensed open source and is the only Hadoop solution to offer unified batch processing, interactive SQL, and interactive search, and role-based access controls. More enterprises have downloaded CDH than all other such distributions combined.
    Sample Customers
    Yelp
    37signals, Adconion,adgooroo, Aggregate Knowledge, AMD, Apollo Group, Blackberry, Box, BT, CSC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Wholesaler/Distributor18%
    Media Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Insurance Company14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Educational Organization9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EMR vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EMR vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EMR is ranked 3rd in Hadoop with 20 reviews while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in Hadoop with 47 reviews. Amazon EMR is rated 7.8, while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon EMR writes "Provides efficient data processing features and has good scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". Amazon EMR is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift, Apache Spark and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB, Cassandra and InfluxDB. See our Amazon EMR vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop report.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.