AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
NetApp
Video Not Available
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while NetApp V-Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NetApp V-Series [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetApp V-Series [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.