Apache Spark vs Netezza Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,498 views|1,884 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
235 views|103 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.
To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics.""DataFrame: Spark SQL gives the leverage to create applications more easily and with less coding effort.""The memory processing engine is the solution's most valuable aspect. It processes everything extremely fast, and it's in the cluster itself. It acts as a memory engine and is very effective in processing data correctly.""The deployment of the product is easy.""The solution is very stable.""I found the solution stable. We haven't had any problems with it.""Now, when we're tackling sentiment analysis using NLP technologies, we deal with unstructured data—customer chats, feedback on promotions or demos, and even media like images, audio, and video files. For processing such data, we rely on PySpark. Beneath the surface, Spark functions as a compute engine with in-memory processing capabilities, enhancing performance through features like broadcasting and caching. It's become a crucial tool, widely adopted by 90% of companies for a decade or more.""There's a lot of functionality."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more.""Speed contributes to large capacity.""The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution.""The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution.""For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable.""It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data.""The most valuable feature is the performance."

More Netezza Analytics Pros →

Cons
"It would be beneficial to enhance Spark's capabilities by incorporating models that utilize features not traditionally present in its framework.""This solution currently cannot support or distribute neural network related models, or deep learning related algorithms. We would like this functionality to be developed.""They could improve the issues related to programming language for the platform.""We've had problems using a Python process to try to access something in a large volume of data. It crashes if somebody gives me the wrong code because it cannot handle a large volume of data.""The management tools could use improvement. Some of the debugging tools need some work as well. They need to be more descriptive.""The migration of data between different versions could be improved.""It should support more programming languages.""At times during the deployment process, the tool goes down, making it look less robust. To take care of the issues in the deployment process, users need to do manual interventions occasionally."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this.""The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities.""Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two.""In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there.""The Analytics feature should be simplified.""The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support.""This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available.""Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."

More Netezza Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
  • "For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
  • "The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
  • More Netezza Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:Here are some things to consider when migrating from Netezza to AWS Redshift A. Migrating your data from Netezza to Redshift may be done using methods such as: o Use a third-party tool to export… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,498
    Comparisons
    1,884
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.7
    11th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    235
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    IBM Netezza Analytics is an embedded, purpose-built, advanced analytics platform that empowers analytic enterprises to meet and exceed their business demands. As features, it can predict with more accuracy, deliver predictions faster and respond rapidly to changes.
    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    A leading online advertising network
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hadoop
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.