Apache Web Server vs Microsoft System Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and Microsoft System Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft System Center Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's reliable, configurable and generally secure.""The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions.""The product is very cheap and stable.""The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly.""The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages.""The solution offers good security.""It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world.""It is scalable."

More Apache Web Server Pros →

"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment.""Good for managing and administering the infrastructure.""The installation process is easy.""The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment.""Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked.""We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it.""It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure).""The detail in the alarms is great."

More Microsoft System Center Pros →

Cons
"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions.""The interface has room for improvement.""By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred.""In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization.""So far, for us, everything is okay.""The product's initial setup process could be easier for users.""The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience.""The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."

More Apache Web Server Cons →

"They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution.""The solution's dashboard needs improvement.""Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement.""System Center hasn't updated to keep up with the industry. It needs improvements in the user interface, ease of use, and overall product functionality, particularly the cloud-monitoring features. It needs more capabilities to monitor AWS and Azure infrastructure.""The solution’s pricing could be improved.""Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there.""In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times.""We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable."

More Microsoft System Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The apache software is free, open-source."
  • "It is a free-of-cost solution."
  • "There is no licensing cost for the product."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More Apache Web Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We maximized our license investment."
  • "It's rolled into our enterprise subscription. The entire subscription is around $25,000 a year, however, that covers all the products that we use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "Microsoft System Center is quite expensive."
  • "I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous."
  • More Microsoft System Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours.
    Top Answer:Some free licenses come under that Apache license. So I don't think we need to pay anything for it.
    Top Answer:Enhanced security features would be great. In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization.
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was easy.
    Top Answer:I know that sometimes there is some reduction in the prices of Microsoft System Center because of the costs of Microsoft SQL Server, which can be advantageous.
    Top Answer:In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times. Our company has to use certain steps with SQL to deal with the dataflow area, making it an easy process… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,813
    Comparisons
    3,203
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    280
    Comparisons
    145
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Apache HTTP Server
    MS System Center
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

    This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

    System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx
    Kassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    University7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft System Center
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 11 reviews while Microsoft System Center is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Useful in deploying servers to host websites with good modularity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and Zend PHP Engine, whereas Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite. See our Apache Web Server vs. Microsoft System Center report.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.