We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage."
"The release management capabilities are great."
"We're a large organization, so we appreciate AppDynamics' wide coverage. It may not work in all areas, but it has broad coverage. We can use the same dataset for different use case aspects. That is the beauty of AppDynamics. You can coordinate APM, EUM, and infrastructure through one dataset."
"AppDynamics has a very broad range of supported technologies, and it's user-friendly. It looks nice, and it's easy to sell the solution to the stakeholders when we can visualize how the website is working. For example, where we have any problems through visual analytics."
"The best feature of AppDynamics is the analytics, which gives us the business insights of the application."
"This solution is easy to use and very powerful, it is a complete tool for us."
"AppDynamics' most valuable feature is Business iQ, which is based on analytics."
"It is used to test customer behavior on a website."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"The AppDynamics installation process needs to be more straightforward. Deploying the product is also tricky."
"The Log Analytics feature is a bit complicated."
"They need to improve the consolidation of agents for the agent's installation process."
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"Their agents sometimes claim to be very lightweight, especially with databases, but they are very heavy. They can take up more compute than the actual work that we need to do."
"AppDynamics is dealing with a lot of products and technologies, so we need to have clear documentation."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"Sometimes, it is hard to navigate through and find if something is wrong or figure out where an error stemmed from."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 24 reviews while TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Good tracing capabilities and helpful technical support but needs better analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "Efficient monitoring, data visibility and easy overview of all data on a single view". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor and Zabbix.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.