We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It provides everything into one view, so we can track information from one place to another."
"After a major incident, root cause analysis is conducted and, most of the time, we understand what caused the incident and how it can be prevented from happening again."
"The monitoring is similar to Dynatrace."
"AppDynamics has been stable."
"It is a good monitoring tool. Its stability is very good."
"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."
"The most valuable feature is the live reporting on the current health\performance of our application"
"The best features of AppDynamics would be the code application monitoring capabilities."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see."
"The integration part in AppDynamics with other systems is an area with a little difficulty, especially when it comes to the configuration area. The integration of AppDynamics with other products takes a lot of time."
"Maybe some more CPU power or something like that could be an area to improve."
"I would like to be able to monitor both cloud an on-prem infrastructures, displayed in one dashboard."
"Its resiliency can be improved. We're told that the best we can do with an on-prem solution is to have a hot standby that requires a manual switchover. So, it is a do-it-yourself Ikea model of maintaining data consistency between two servers, without having low balance or failover considerations for an on-prem solution."
"Rolling out version upgrades is a difficult job at times."
"More native support for other hardware is needed because having to install various extensions and perform extra setup for different devices is really challenging, and not as easy or straightforward as it is in other products."
"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 153 reviews while TruView is ranked 53rd in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor and Zabbix.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.