We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Platform that it supports covers legacy and new. Caters to moving older objects into an integrated DB, relatively popular ones: SQL, Oracle, etc."
"ARIS is probably the most mature product in terms of modeling an enterprise architecture so that it has context."
"Fully-reportable database over Visio."
"The capability to integrate all information of the business and to generate simulations of processes. It can analyze the model of operations quickly."
"The tool defines the processes. It's the documentation of everything."
"ARIS BPA has a good directory option, which helps to keep track of all of your metadata, and that's very useful."
"MFT is quite attractive. A large amount of data is passed in almost no time and it is quite easy to use."
"You can relate different aspects of an organization to each other, and you can clearly define the rates seen in the application."
"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"It is easy and cheap."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"The product is difficult to use for someone without prior knowledge of working with it. It requires a certain level of administration training."
"We should have the ability to download ARIS EPCs to Visio."
"The workflow approval process could be represented better in the overviews."
"The standard out-of-the-box solutions for modeling are not so good. You have to do some configuration to make it easier and more user-friendly."
"I had this decentralization mission where I had some friendly fights with the consultants of Software AG. My opinion was the business department should be able to publish their processes and do all their evaluation stuff in ARCM themselves. It has to be a one stop shop. I want a one stop shop to go from ARIS BPM to ARIS ARCM, because having everything go through that would be an improvement due to the inputs that we made with Software AG. They will make it possible that the trigger sent from BPM to ARCM will start their object generation."
"There is not enough documentation provided for the tool's support or administration."
"I would like the possibility to use real data. In other words, it can use this system to integrate with others that are operating directing with users like clients, employs, and others."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."
"The time it takes to get from deployment to production could be faster."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Pega BPM. See our ARIS BPA vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
