We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."ARIS has a good collaboration function. You create a portal where any authorized users can work on the models. There are simple flows for making and approving changes."
"There is a module designer, that one is very powerful and it creates very good reports."
"Also, the UML parts have been improved very much in the last two years. And it's very powerful now to combine the BPMN and UML parts in the product, because you can make a connection between them, so that you have the right interoperability between them. So if you're doing data modeling, you can use your class diagram and bind that to the BPMN part."
"In addition to our applications, we have also stored, in ARIS, the footprint of where those applications have been implemented. That means we know in which country a given application has been implemented. With embedded geolocation, we have a very visual world map, where we can see the footprint of each application."
"Aris BPA has a lot of tools that are more professional than Bizagi."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"The ability to sort via multiple criteria to identify the relationships you need for a specific object."
"The most valuable feature in the latest versions is the connect portal, where you can do very simple modeling using the web-based portal."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"End-to-end visibility and real-time are areas that will need greater attention."
"It would be helpful if ARIS BPA could have a simple database to get the extract of various attributes."
"Training is one of the important aspects for process awareness. As soon as a process is rolled out, process training is required. If ARIS could generate output in PowerPoint, it would be great for business users."
"We should have the ability to download ARIS EPCs to Visio."
"One of the biggest challenges is to realistically enable the defined structures of the processes that you have in ARIS documented, and then actually implement them in the business."
"Regarding stability, when there are any customized settings being done at customer end - post upgrade to newer versions - it makes the customer environment unstable for a short duration."
"The solution's processes are huge and it is not easy to get an overview of how things work. It needs to improve the interface. I would like to see the product include a better overview of processes and improve search."
"One thing that could be improved is regarding the handling of the content itself. Maybe ARIS could provide a set of best practices, or best processes, so that people do not have to start from scratch."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
ARIS BPA is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 20 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "Capable of handling a wide range of business processes but presents users complexity with two interfaces (Java application and web interface)". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.