We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."If you ever tried to draw a picture in a browser app or with a cloud service, it is normally a painful death. ARIS works perfectly on diagrams in the browser, so I was excited. I like it because there have been so many bad experiences in the past with drawing or doing something in a browser. Normally, it's always painful because it's coded badly. With ARIS, it is really well-implemented. It's simple."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Aris BPA has a lot of tools that are more professional than Bizagi."
"The most valuable features are business process modeling and reporting."
"Collaboration and governance over enterprise artifacts."
"I like everything about ARIS BPA. I've used it for a long time and it's a fantastic tool. There is a list of things ARIS has that other solutions do not have."
"In addition to our applications, we have also stored, in ARIS, the footprint of where those applications have been implemented. That means we know in which country a given application has been implemented. With embedded geolocation, we have a very visual world map, where we can see the footprint of each application."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"I use it strictly for developing the business process model. I don't use it for the actual automation. I do that with Vtenext. I have standardized on Vtenext, and I don't use ARIS BPM anymore. The Vtenext UI is just as good, and it is much more tightly coupled to the underlying object model. I can get more done in one session with Vtenext rather than first going to ARIS BPM, then importing, and having to edit it for tight coupling."
"User interface (UI)."
"I would like to see the reporting aspects improved."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"ARIS has an internal fully customizable workflow system called APG, which is very good, but it’s targeted mostly at creating workflows related to ARIS content, and not general workflows to support other processes inside a company."
"The standard out-of-the-box solutions for modeling are not so good. You have to do some configuration to make it easier and more user-friendly."
"One of the issues is, when you are defining databases, the way they use entities and relationship diagrams, the way we can define data, like data models, there is still a part they could improve."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
ARIS BPA is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.