We performed a comparison between Asigra and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."It has helped us to provide comprehensive data protection with high recovery rates and a malware scanning feature."
"The solution has been very stable."
"The agentless architecture has minimized our software footprint at the client level."
"I have found all the features useful in the solution."
"Deduplication and compression are the best features of the solution, which are popular and very effective."
"I like Data Domain as a protocol for data backup."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The deduplication feature is the most valuable part of the solution."
"The product, a disk backup solution, improves our data application tasks. We used tape libraries with Dev drives in legacy architectures, resulting in slow backups compared to modern drives like NVMe and SSDs. By transitioning to NVMe and SSDs, backups have become much faster. The tool's backup restoration is faster compared to other tools."
"The features that I have found most valuable with Dell EMC PowerProtect DD are its deduplication feature and its DD Boost protocol for fast transfer, which is amazing."
"Short backup window has made a difference in the way my organization functions."
"Dell PowerProtect DD is a stable solution."
"They should improve the malware scanning capabilities, extending it to protect cloud application data."
"The management could be a bit better."
"Dell EMC Data Domain needs to have better compatibility between NetWorker and the hardware. NetWorker is not as good as the other products which are currently on the market like Backup Exec."
"Dell PowerProtect DD could improve by having better integration with other backup solutions."
"First-time integrations are difficult in NetWorker. NetWorker software needs to be simplified. It's very complex."
"When you use Data Domain, you have to have at least 20% free space so it can work properly. Sometimes we struggle with that, because we wanted to use all the free space, but then Data Domain becomes really slow. I understand that 20% is needed to process all the data, and doing the duplication and compression and all that, but it would be a big improvement if they did not require that 20%, because it is just too much to have available."
"They should reduce the CPC cost to customers. The product is becoming very expensive."
"Dell PowerProtect DD should come out with its own system so we do not have to use Data Domain. For example, something similar to what Symantec has done."
"They're scalable."
"Its management can be improved."
More Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Asigra is ranked 57th in Backup and Recovery while Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is ranked 1st in Deduplication Software with 61 reviews. Asigra is rated 8.2, while Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Asigra writes "Automated notifications work much better than other solutions we've employed, and the ability to add usage reports to invoices through DS-Billing is a very useful feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) writes "Supports business continuity process but needs improvement in pricing". Asigra is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is most compared with HPE StoreOnce, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, ExaGrid EX Series, Rubrik and Veeam Backup & Replication.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.