We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use ASP.NET to develop web applications and web API. I'm working at a government financial institution in Mexico that helps citizens buy a house"
"I have found the entity framework to be a valuable feature. The authentication layer is amazing as well. ASP.NET has a vibrant community, and as a result, we haven't had the need to contact technical support."
"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"ASP.NET is stable. I did not have to do any maintenance on it."
"It's a pretty stable solution."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"I was testing how to publish in a cloud using Azure and it was very easy."
"I like the performance, stability and ease of use."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the database connections."
"One of the most valuable features is its support. It's easy for me to get support even though I never use it. If there's a bug or a performance issue, Microsoft also provides quick updates, and this is another valuable feature of the program."
"We use TFS for our scrums, which links our tasks to actual code changes."
"The solution is stable, and it has no issues."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is the user interface."
"There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."
"Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side."
"In addition to the visual aspect, there is a need for ASP.NET to provide a robust visual front end like there was in the past."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"I am sure there is something that has room for improvement but nothing specific comes to mind."
"An area for improvement is the structure template."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"It could use better reporting and documentation."
"IntelliSense could be better."
"There could be more coding languages in the solution."
"The reporting services are quite limited in terms of features and need to be improved."
"I would like the solution to have a designing default in addition to the current coding default."
"The product could be improved by including axle intelligence."
"It would be great if they added some extra support for other languages that are available in the market and prepared it for the, let's say, crypto developers as we are going in the age of cryptocurrency."
"We'd like the solution to be more secure."
"It would be better if it didn't get stuck. Sometimes when we are writing code, we open too many tabs and modules, and it gets stuck."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.