We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"The solution has good scalability."
"It is seamless compared to Java or any other technology stack."
"The solution is very easy to maintain because UI management is simple and many libraries are available."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."
"The solution is easy to learn, understand and develop."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET."
"The most valuable feature is how smoothly it runs."
"The solution includes a debug function that I can breakpoint to easily detect what is wrong with my applications."
"Most valuable features include code navigation by symbols and document auto formatting."
"We use the solution to develop applications."
"It is definitely sophisticated and provides many out-of-the-box features. Going community has boosted all that."
"I like that it works fine and that it performs better than competing products. I'm very happy with Microsoft Visual Studio."
"It's pretty prevalent."
"The solution can scale."
"The con is that every year they are launching a new technology, and for a company like us, we get confused which version should be used."
"Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side."
"The solution's initial setup is intermediate, and it could be improved."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"It could use better reporting and documentation."
"There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"The GUI of Microsoft Visual Studio could improve."
"The solution’s technical support could be improved."
"The UI could be better, and development could be easier on Microsoft Visual Studio if there were more features like drag and drop and more frameworks, etc."
"We'd like the solution to be more secure."
"IntelliSense could be better."
"I would like to see more tools in the next release."
"The product could be improved by including axle intelligence."
"The solution is not really good at debugging JavaScript, jQuery, or SQL"
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
