We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and Microsoft Visual Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ASP.NET is stable. I did not have to do any maintenance on it."
"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."
"The solution is easy to integrate and understand. It has a very good user interface and a lot of prebuilt tools, which require a lot less coding if we compare it to other solutions."
"The solution's framework supports storing all client-side and server-side code in one place."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The solution is very easy to maintain because UI management is simple and many libraries are available."
"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."
"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."
"While you're coding, it's really nice to be able to print stuff out and make sure that all the data is being organized the way you want it to be."
"We can use different .NET features."
"It's pretty prevalent."
"Most valuable features include code navigation by symbols and document auto formatting."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Visual Studio is the good intelligence and UI."
"It's a universal solution. I like that I can easily find software developers for it. I can easily find staff on Microsoft forums. Also, we have other components that are running on top of Visual Studio. I like that it is open to other platforms. Finally, there are many many resources for Microsoft Visual Studio and I can easily find support. There is a large knowledge base for it as well."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The installation of the solution is easy."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit."
"The capability related to Python needs to be improved."
"The technology to integrate with cloud information could be improved."
"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."
"The solution needs to support its framework on all devices used for mobile application development."
"The solution is not really good at debugging JavaScript, jQuery, or SQL"
"We'd like the solution to be more secure."
"It would be great if they added some extra support for other languages that are available in the market and prepared it for the, let's say, crypto developers as we are going in the age of cryptocurrency."
"Every time it updates, there are issues."
"Microsoft Visual Studio can improve integration with the Microsoft Office suite; this was only implemented in 2022."
"I have faced configuration issues with Microsoft Visual Studio."
"I would not recommend it for complex tasks."
"Its setup process could be more straightforward."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 79 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Easy to use, works well in the Microsoft Windows ecosystem, and integrates well with Git". ASP.NET is most compared with SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Genero and Microsoft Silverlight. See our ASP.NET vs. Microsoft Visual Studio report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.