We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scalability is enough for our use cases. It covers all our needs."
"It is easy to use."
"The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"It is just the fact that it is a one-stop shop for all project documentation. It is compared to storing things in files and directories and stuff like that. It provides the overall usability and accessibility of many projects and documents in one area."
"The most beneficial aspect is real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same documents simultaneously."
"It is stable and reliable."
"Pricing is not a problem."
"Great shareable and co-editing features."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"Its most valuable feature is the document library."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services."
"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"The search function is not great."
"We have to use other applications that make Atlassian Confluence more customized for what you want. They should improve by adding the ability to make more customizations."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"The product is considered expensive."
"Atlassian needs to provide the source editor or a built-in plugin."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The cost of the solution is too high."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
"The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem."
"It should have more user-friendly customization, as it still requires developers to get engaged and build sites."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"Make it more intuitive."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.