We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Yammer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I find the most valuable about Confluence is how easy it is to use."
"As for valuable features, the team management features help us to share information very easily."
"The solution helped us to see where we were going wrong and where we were doing good, and that helped us to make proper decisions"
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"The initial setup is very easy."
"We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"The search functionality is a really powerful feature."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"It's really easy to use the solution."
"The user interface and the way we can share and search information are the most valuable. It is very easy to use."
"We can send out notifications and ask questions using Yammer."
"The initial setup was simple and straightforward."
"Its most valuable features are the storyline and communities."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the communication events."
"Yammer brings in the most relevant posts to the users."
"The solution was stable."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"Atlassian Confluence should improve the interface, it needs to be more user-friendly. It is easy to use, but it could be more intuitive."
"They can improve the table feature of Confluence. It is currently not adequate."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"There needs to be a flexible pricing model, where we can pick and choose services and customize our pricing model."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"This solution would be improved if it was well integrated with other communication applications."
"It should have integration with multiple third-party platforms."
"Sometimes, we lose access to the solution for unknown reasons."
"Yammer's UX and UI are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required"
"Microsoft should work on templating and provide some built-in templates so that the changes can automatically roll out to all the configured communities."
"If you are using other applications that are tough to integrate into the environment, that can cause limitations."
"I faced some issues with Yammer's mobile app when I shifted from Android to iPhone, and it got a little bit tricky to use it on an iPhone, which took away some of my time."
"The solution must be able to stream by itself, without integration, the same way that you are able to do it on Facebook Live, Instagram, etc. Streaming must be embedded into it."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 98 reviews while Yammer is ranked 4th in Enterprise Social Software with 60 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Yammer is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Yammer writes "Ease of use and a familiar user interface". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Yammer is most compared with Workplace by Facebook, SAP Jam, Chatter, Jive and HCL Connections. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Yammer report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.