We performed a comparison between Oracle Audit Vault and Trustwave DbProtect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."Oracle Audit Vault has a lot of great features, but what I find most valuable is the database firewall."
"The solution is very stable and reliable."
"Technical support is perfect."
"It is a good product for controlling all databases. It is helpful for auditing the data. When people are doing any actions on the databases, they are recorded automatically in the vault. You can work on the collected data to find out exactly what is happening on a database. You can implement database encryption on the databases to control people's access to the database content, such as rows and tables."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it can help us secure our databases."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Audit Vault is that it is agentless and enhanced user interface."
"All of the other components that make up the infrastructure in the environment including the operating system are also quite valuable."
"It has provided us with a unique opportunity to automate risk discovery."
"Transfer and vulnerability scanning are the most valuable features of this product."
"This solution helps our clients to monitor their database use, and detect violations of the policy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that you can have a good view which is provided with a proper division of all your databases, which you can see in Trustwave DbProtect."
"The product monitors only the database and not the operating systems."
"Stability could be improved, we have had some challenges"
"They should simplify the integration and work with different vendors and mechanisms."
"The support could improve."
"Currently, you need two servers: one for Audit Vault and one for the firewall. If they can combine them into one server, it will be great because it is costly to have two servers. It will also make its installation easier. I have heard that in the new version, there will be only one server for both."
"The performance of Oracle Audit Vault could be improved, especially in handling large data collections and generating reports on time."
"An easy, friendly user interface would be nice to have, since this would enable administrators to identify important events with a prompt response."
"I hear from many people that say IBM Guardian is better than Oracle Audit Vault when it comes to performance. IBM Guardian works transparently in the database, but Oracle Audit Vault consumes some ratios on the server."
"The product does not have encryption or data masking."
"We have not been able to integrate this product with a lot of standard incident response solutions, so an open API would help in this regard."
"I have seen that the tool's installation phase has some problems regarding the versions, specifically the version of SQL."
Oracle Audit Vault is ranked 3rd in Database Security with 28 reviews while Trustwave DbProtect is ranked 4th in Database Security with 6 reviews. Oracle Audit Vault is rated 8.0, while Trustwave DbProtect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Audit Vault writes "Enhanced interface, agentless, and simple setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave DbProtect writes "A tool that offers a proper view and division of all databases while also allowing users to do continuous monitoring". Oracle Audit Vault is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, DB Networks DBN-6300, DataSunrise Database Security and jSonar, whereas Trustwave DbProtect is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Trustwave AppDetectivePRO.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.