We performed a comparison between Imperva SecureSphere Database Security and Oracle Audit Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are three major main use cases of this solution. The first one is to fulfill compliance regulations. Customers—especially the banks, health sector, and manufacturing—need to comply with the regulations in different countries. They have to fulfill compliance regulations around the privacy of data. In order to fulfill those requirements, they're using Imperva. It helps them to fulfill these requirements, and they are not fined by the regulators. That is the first use case why people buy Imperva."
"The most valuable features of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are the user-friendliness, easy-to-use interface compared to competitors, database operations do not need a specialist, and simple to manage for our security team. Additionally, the solution can show all the databases and the level of sensitivity. It can show what is more sensitive or less sensitive."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the database security policy."
"They have very good documentation and knowledgebase resources that add to the depth of their support."
"It has a lot of different components that cover the needs of our customers."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"We use it for database security, vulnerability analysis, discovery, and handling requests from applications and users."
"A solution which does what other name brand products do for a lower cost."
"All of the other components that make up the infrastructure in the environment including the operating system are also quite valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Audit Vault is that it is agentless and enhanced user interface."
"This solution acts as a complete data warehouse for our audit data."
"Out-of-the-box policies ensure our compliance with standards like SOX, ISO 27001, and so on."
"Our clients can see all of their past actions or the wrong activity done on the network. We can load the diagnostics for the business."
"Our client was scheduled to take a year and a half to set up compliance, but by deploying this product they were able to do the compliance reports within three months."
"A powerful, flexible solution for database traffic monitoring."
"Technical support is perfect."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"The updates could be better."
"The firewall features are not very strong and should be improved."
"Improvements can be made in data enrichment and enhancing the GUI (Graphical User Interface) for a better user experience."
"It would be better to update the solution by using a GUI that guides me, rather than through a CLI."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
"I have worked with IBM before, and I prefer its ease of deployment and management. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has tricky deployment, whereas IBM's deployment is straightforward because of the UI."
"The only challenge I see is that SecureSphere is deployed on servers or databases which are held on physical infrastructure. However, there are databases which are hosted on cloud platforms and Imperva has a separate tool altogether for that, not SecureSphere."
"An easy, friendly user interface would be nice to have, since this would enable administrators to identify important events with a prompt response."
"Currently, you need two servers: one for Audit Vault and one for the firewall. If they can combine them into one server, it will be great because it is costly to have two servers. It will also make its installation easier. I have heard that in the new version, there will be only one server for both."
"We would like to see the ability to administer and manage the solution through Enterprise Manager 13c, and development of the dashboards that are generally missing."
"Customized reporting is something that we are struggling with, and it is quite tough for us."
"I hear from many people that say IBM Guardian is better than Oracle Audit Vault when it comes to performance. IBM Guardian works transparently in the database, but Oracle Audit Vault consumes some ratios on the server."
"Stability could be improved, we have had some challenges"
"The product monitors only the database and not the operating systems."
"They should simplify the integration and work with different vendors and mechanisms."
More Imperva SecureSphere Database Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is ranked 2nd in Database Security with 52 reviews while Oracle Audit Vault is ranked 3rd in Database Security with 27 reviews. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is rated 8.2, while Oracle Audit Vault is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security writes "The fine-grained auditing available on the platform makes life easier and helps explain anything happening in your database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Audit Vault writes "Enhanced interface, agentless, and simple setup". Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, DataSunrise Database Security, Trustwave DbProtect, jSonar and Imperva DDoS, whereas Oracle Audit Vault is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, Trustwave DbProtect, DB Networks DBN-6300, DataSunrise Database Security and jSonar. See our Imperva SecureSphere Database Security vs. Oracle Audit Vault report.
See our list of best Database Security vendors.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.