Autodesk PLM 360 vs CAXA PLM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Autodesk Logo
134 views|113 comparisons
CAXA Logo
43 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
10th
out of 25 in PLM Tools
Views
134
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
20th
out of 25 in PLM Tools
Views
43
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Datastay
Learn More
Overview

PLM helps you accelerate your product development processes across all departments and locations by automating workflows, key tasks and delivering timely information. Because Fusion Lifecycle is on the cloud, everyone has access to the data they need anytime, anywhere.

CAXA PLM Collaborative Management is a software product and service for manufacturing product data lifecycle management. It integrates mature 2D, 3D, PDM, CAPP and MES technologies on a unified collaborative management platform, covering conceptual design and detailed design. From the process flow to the manufacturing process, the key points are to solve the application requirements of the departments and the global sharing of enterprise product data after deepening the application of information management, and realize the unified management of enterprise design data, process data and manufacturing data.
Sample Customers
Alstom Power Automation & Control (PAC)
Tianjin Machinery & Electric Industry School, Hefei University of Technology

Autodesk PLM 360 is ranked 10th in PLM Tools while CAXA PLM is ranked 20th in PLM Tools. Autodesk PLM 360 is rated 0.0, while CAXA PLM is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Autodesk PLM 360 is most compared with Siemens PLM TeamCenter and PTC Windchill, whereas CAXA PLM is most compared with .

See our list of best PLM Tools vendors.

We monitor all PLM Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.