We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring."The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"The dashboards are great for gathering analytic information and seeing where the problems are."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"What I like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager are its features, particularly the active session history. It provides insights into SQL, and I use it regularly to identify potential issues."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Oracle Enterprise Manager was straightforward."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"I would like to improve the cost."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"In my experience, the monitoring could be improved."
"The user interface is not very interactive. It needs improvement."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 36th in Server Monitoring while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.