We performed a comparison between Bizagi and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects."
"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"One of the features I like is that when drawing any task, when putting a task on the process model canvas, I can simply click on it and see the other task icons for that task. It's just one quick, simple, straightforward connectivity from task to task."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"The approval process is simple."
"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."
"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"The solution is stable."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API."
"The case management and its integration with process design are good features."
"We made the transformation to agile. Altogether with BPM, it is the total package."
"Initially, the process architecture studio was very helpful and it was compliant with BPMN standards."
"We like that it does not require a lot of hours to train our people."
"The reach with Integration Adapters and support for adding custom Java code are valuable features."
"One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer."
"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."
"Enhancing data generation methods for easier printing and refining the file attachment and user interface to optimize usability."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected."
"The product must make automation easier."
"Importing and exporting between multiple environments is more difficult with other tools."
"IBM BPM is stable, but sometimes there are issues with the server."
"The stability varies because it involves a lot of other components like databases, so sometimes if something goes wrong there, it can't recover from the fatal errors."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"Finding errors and bugs on the system is not easy. We can't seem to use the events or logs to find them, so it makes it difficult to debug the system. They really need to work on their debugging features to make is much, much easier. It would improve the solution considerably and should be something they add in a future release."
"Better integration with other products in the automation suite."
"New users will need at least six months to get comfortable with IBM BPM, at least initially. So, there's a learning curve."
"I would say the scalability is very good but it's not perfect. It is much more scalable than it has been in the past but... it does require some work to keep it stable. So that is an area that should be improved."
Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita and Microsoft Power Apps, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Bizagi vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.