Cisco Nexus vs ExtremeSwitching comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,871 views|2,161 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Extreme Logo
1,248 views|747 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Nexus and ExtremeSwitching based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus vs. ExtremeSwitching Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Technical support has been very, very helpful and they offer good SLAs.""The most valuable feature of Cisco Nexus is modularity. It's like the Swiss Army knife of switches.""Its low latency is most valuable. Its performance is good, and it is also very stable.""The flexibility, how accurately the VPCs operate as well as the redundancy built into it with the VPCs are the most valuable features.""The most valuable features are the solution is robust, you are able to use it for fabric architecture as well as SPAN on exit with the controller.""This solution has saved us both time and money because we now have the ability to control all of these telephony devices that are deployed nationwide.""Cisco Nexus and Cisco Catalyst have processing power and offer good utilization of Cisco devices.""We now have one box that does multiple services."

More Cisco Nexus Pros →

"Performance is good.""In the case of small businesses, the solution is budget-friendly and easy to configure.""The stability has been largely pretty good.""Our vendors are great and they offer very good support services.""ExtremeSwitching fabric technology is a unique technology used to protect against viruses. ExtremeCloud IQ is a very good and feature-rich solution compared to Cisco, Ruxi Networks, or Huawei.""The unique ring topology is actually a handy innovation.""The solution has inspection firewalls that can do a deep packet inspection on a port basis.""Setup was easy. It only took a couple of hours to set up."

More ExtremeSwitching Pros →

Cons
"Data center access is stable and high speed but it is not compatible with Cisco's server hardware devices. The solution can be technically improved and can have features like automation, better visibility, better functionality, and cheap pricing.""If we could get some more automation integrated into it, it would make it easier.""There is an ongoing problem with the limitation of the TCAM table, which is that it doesn't have enough memory to allow you to be really granular with your policy.""Technical support could be better.""The solution is more expensive than other options on the market.""It would be nice if the solution offered multiple types of port support.""We have encountered some software bugs.""The initial setup is always complex."

More Cisco Nexus Cons →

"ExtremeSwitching switches are not prevalent in the industry, so it's harder to go online and research how to deploy their APs or switches. There is a broader user community for Cisco and Juniper because they've been around for a while and everybody has a bit of knowledge they can publish online.""The solution as a whole has hardware quality issues.""The training and resources for learning are lacking.""The interface could be improved.""Extreme Networks does not have any entry-level products. This is a problem for them because Aruba has an Instant On series, which is new and cost-effective. Cisco also has the 1000 series, and other brands offer entry-level products.""The licensing is expensive.""I believe they should be more aggressive in terms of pricing.""ExtremeSwitching is scalable to a certain extent for SME-segmented IP."

More ExtremeSwitching Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Costs more than most, but the reliability pays for the difference."
  • "The price of this solution is good when compared to others in the market."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year."
  • "Every Cisco product is more expensive than competitors on the market, which is just a fact, but from my perspective, it is worth it."
  • "All of our costs including subscription, licensing, and support services are bundled together, and the cost is approximately $100,000 USD per year."
  • "This is a very expensive product."
  • "The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."
  • "Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $200 USD per month."
  • More Cisco Nexus Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On pricing, ExtremeSwitches are going to beat most of the major competition."
  • "It is not a subscription-based model, and there is no licensing concept. We have to pay for hardware AMC. We have hardware on our premises and for the hardware support, we have to go for the annual maintenance contract with the partner."
  • "The pricing and licensing are good with the cloud."
  • "There is a cost for ExtremeSwitching and if you want the support and maintenance, there are additional costs. My clients typically pay for the support and maintenance annually."
  • "There is no license required to use the solution. The hardware controller is expensive, and this is why I prefer controlling ExtremeSwitching on the cloud."
  • "The price is expensive. We pay for a license, but you have to pay more if you want to increase the number."
  • "We paid 25,000 to 30,000 INR."
  • "ExtremeSwitching offers very good pricing plans for their licenses. Compared to their rivals, ExtremeSwitching's prices are very affordable and reasonable. This is why our customers are happy to pay for their service critical support. ExtremeSwitching also offers a great portal to track clients, further satisfying our customers. They are always happy to pay for the service every month. The pricing is very reasonable."
  • More ExtremeSwitching Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution excels in configuration and other aspects. It offers reliability and performance.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive because of its working nature.
    Top Answer:ExtremeSwitching hardware lacks flexibility compared to some other options.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    2,871
    Comparisons
    2,161
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    8.7
    7th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    1,248
    Comparisons
    747
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.
    ExtremeSwitching is the family of products comprising different switch types: Modular (X8 and 8000 series [formerly BlackDiamond] and S and K series switches); Stackable (X-series and A, B, C, and 7100 series switches); Standalone (SSA, X430, and D, 200, 800, and ISW series); and Mobile Backhaul (E4G). ExtremeSwitching work from Edge Switching that ensures the performance and reliable operation of end-user devices and applications including port density, bandwidth, and network services to Aggregation / Core Switches is designed for the demanding needs of aggregation, top-of-rack and campus core environments, these switches deliver 10Gb, 40Gb and even 100Gb bandwidth with maximum throughput and reliability.
    Sample Customers
    Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
    Blue Waters
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Government17%
    University17%
    Security Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Construction Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Nexus vs. ExtremeSwitching
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. ExtremeSwitching and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Nexus is ranked 6th in LAN Switching with 101 reviews while ExtremeSwitching is ranked 7th in LAN Switching with 17 reviews. Cisco Nexus is rated 8.4, while ExtremeSwitching is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Nexus writes " Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtremeSwitching writes "Easy to configure, with a switching-level security feature". Cisco Nexus is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Juniper QFX Series Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Aruba Instant On Switches, whereas ExtremeSwitching is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches and NETGEAR Switches. See our Cisco Nexus vs. ExtremeSwitching report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors and best Data Center Networking vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.