Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] vs Juniper WXC [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] and Juniper WXC [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Additional features, such as Flash Proxies, have their own licensing fees that depend on what the requirements are."
  • More Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WXC
    Learn More
    Juniper
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    ProxySG appliances provide complete control over all your web traffic, delivering world-class threat protection. Robust features include user authentication, web filtering, data loss prevention, inspection, and visibility of SSL-encrypted traffic, content caching, bandwidth management, stream-splitting and more.
    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Global Technology and Material Manufacturer
    AARNet Pty Ltd, BancABC, Catholic Health System, Cloud Dynamics, DQE Communications, Expedient, Global Investment Bank, HEAnet, Hosting, London Internet Exchange Ltd (LINX), Massachusetts Broadband Institute, High Performance Networks Inc., Meijer, MercaSID, S.A., Multinational Financial Services Provider, Neutrona, Nevada Health CO-OP, Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC), Revlon Inc., Springfield Public Schools (SPS), St. Catherine University, University of Hertfordshire, Valdosta State University, zulily
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Juniper WXC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Juniper WXC [EOL] is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] writes "Now we are able to inspect full SSL traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper WXC [EOL] writes "Compression, acceleration & mulit-path are valuable, however look at alternatives as the Juniper WXC is end-of-sale". Blue Coat ProxySG [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Juniper WXC [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.