We performed a comparison between DX Unified Infrastructure Management and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"It provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for our open systems."
"It is easy to implement but requires good planning."
"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."
"Latest version of tool comes integrated with Jaspersoft reporting solution, giving excellent reports."
"It is easy to implement."
"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"Power packs."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"It is simple."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"Currently lacks a mobile application which would be helpful."
"The company has not kept pace with developments."
"Stability."
"We've had issues with pulling reports."
"We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."
"We have experienced challenges with finding a mechanism to deploy the agents, but it's only on the first deployment so it's not a big issue."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"ScienceLogic could improve the implementation, it could be made easier."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"They need a little more self-service."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 38th in Network Monitoring Software with 8 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "A simple product that is easy to deploy and very easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Granular discovery, good integration, with responsive and available support". DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and Nagios XI, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and ServiceNow Discovery. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors, and best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.