We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was really easy and straightforward."
"The most valuable features are CleanAir, Rogue Detection, and the auto-calculation of RF."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"Our university has experienced a positive return on investment, and I believe Cisco Wireless WAN will continue to benefit us for at least a decade."
"We have found that the product scales well."
"The security and the capabilities of the platform are the most valuable features."
"Granularity of standardization and technical controls."
"We used everything Cisco, not just wireless. It works great with other Cisco tools."
"I like the price, quality, and consistency of manufacturing."
"This access point provides internet to every lab on campus, including the computer laboratory"
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"We had a client with a power plant. Different wireless devices from various brands caused problems. We fixed it using the Ubiquiti Wireless UDM controller and installed 75 access points and antennas."
"Easy to use and flexible."
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"It is very stable and the equipment lasts quite a long time."
"The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects."
"Cisco Wireless WAN is expensive."
"The price could be better."
"The initial setup and deployment should be easier."
"Cisco Wireless WAN would be improved with the ability to monitor new usernames, product registrations, and flow traffic."
"The solution could lower its pricing to make it more affordable."
"The new platform of Cisco Wireless WAN I did not like, there weren't many features available. The online platform has more options."
"We did have issues with the product that made us concerned about the overall stability."
"There are limitations on the SSIDs that could improve. We cannot enable two ways of authenticating users on one SSID. For a number of places, we have to provide different modes of certification for the user which requires us to create another SSID for the broadcast."
"The solution should offer simpler management for guests. That would be helpful in the hospitality industry, for example."
"We'd like them to improve aspects of device management."
"Sometimes we have some micro breaks we do not know what causes them."
"The cost is on the higher side and could be lower."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve stability."
"In Ukraine at least, it's a problem when it comes to buying the hardware. For example, I made a request for 20 switches a few months ago. The solution needs to have worldwide availability."
"The Unifi controller software has a small issue."
"We'd like the solution to be more stable and have fewer firmware upgrades."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Aruba Wireless. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.