We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cisco Wireless WAN is stable and scalable, and the support received is good."
"I like that it has integrated the cost of our network access."
"I like how the look and feel of the product is standardized to match other Cisco solutions."
"The most valuable features for me are the ease of operation and scalability."
"It's a reliable solution."
"We find the product to be stable."
"It's a small feature, but Cisco allows me to see access points with blinking lights. This shows me which access point is which."
"We don't see many troubleshooting issues. Normally, it's a user error when it comes to the JSS or the VPN. Once they log into the system or they get on the internet, then they log directly into the JSS, so they can do their work."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to use the main centralized administration process and the internet."
"The main strength of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of use it provides to users."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up."
"It's a well priced solution and as far as I'm concerned, it's enterprise class."
"Easy to use and flexible."
"The pricing of the solution is excellent. It offers a great value."
"Very simple, very basic setup for Ubiquiti Wireless. Its performance in a home or small business setting with fewer access points is fantastic."
"If there's a problem, it's usually when Cisco pushes out updates. The users don't always push the updates to their computer, and it causes some issues. It's reliable as long as everyone is doing what they're supposed to."
"It can be complicated to configure the solution."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"In terms of improvement, there is always something that could be enhanced. For example, we can't change wireless channels in Cisco Meraki due to a recent standard update."
"The reporting feature needs improvement, especially adding information with regards to availability uptime."
"Improvements can be made in the wireless fabric."
"We have had some problems connecting to the internet with Cisco Wireless WAN, but it is not the equipment or configuration. Additionally, the integration with access control security could improve."
"The interface is a little bit difficult to understand at times. It would be good if Cisco were to make it user friendly so that everyone can easily configure it without the need to do certifications and courses to learn how to use all of the devices."
"We'd like them to improve aspects of device management."
"It's hard to get stuff delivered on time."
"The solution needs to improve its features and offer more to the customer."
"The production is not very stable in our experience."
"The control system can be improved by making it easier."
"There's one feature missing and that is automatic channel assignment."
"Central monitoring is the main functionality that should be included in the product."
"There should be an easier way to contact the support. If we need to do something on it, it will be easier and faster if there is a support number to call. Currently, their support is mostly through email or chat. If there is a hotline that you can call directly, that would be good. It will really help a lot. They should also include more after-sales support. They can maybe also provide more details on what's happening with the network."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Aruba Wireless. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.