We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's best features are simple management, the cloud base, dashboards, and reliability."
"The Cisco solution is good, the new GUI looks good and we are seeing more telemetry from it."
"Provides good visibility and insights into what is happening."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's best feature is the integration with other Cisco products."
"The technical support we have experienced has been good."
"We find the product to be stable."
"I use Cisco because of its reliability."
"The indoor WiFi connection works well."
"The solution has an easy configuration."
"The setup is quite simple."
"Easy to use and flexible."
"The 3x3 MIMO antenna provides excellent coverage and the product is well supported by Ubiquiti in terms of firmware updates."
"The solution offers us good situational awareness by providing information on user activity, signal strength, and all the data that you need to manage the system and understand issues."
"The pricing of the solution is excellent. It offers a great value."
"The main strength of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of use it provides to users."
"The tool's speed and IP address acquisition from the domain controller should be improved"
"The new platform of Cisco Wireless WAN I did not like, there weren't many features available. The online platform has more options."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"It needs to increase its strength in capacity."
"Cisco Wireless WAN is expensive."
"The network management system is not great."
"The coverage area on some of the low-end access points isn't the best. The high-end ones are fine, but we've had bad experiences on the other ones."
"The price of Cisco Wireless WAN could improve, it is expensive."
"The control system can be improved by making it easier."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"This product has issues with scalability and ease of manageability at scale. Security also needs to be improved, when compared to its competitors. Ubiquiti Wireless doesn't have any support that you can call. They only have an online portal where you can access support documentation, but it's not great. You have to figure out issues and solutions for yourself."
"Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly."
"o if you are setting up any other third party product or any other different product, it sometimes can be a bit difficult. With Ubiquiti, you need to set up because you can adopt the product and that's it, where if it's not a Ubiquiti product it can sometimes be a difficult setup."
"The Unifi controller software has a small issue."
"Central monitoring is the main functionality that should be included in the product."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Aruba Wireless. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.