We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis."
"With a cluster available, you can manage the security layer using the shared SDX - it provides flexibility."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools."
"InfoSphere Streams was the one core product from the platform in which we were using. We were building a real-time response system and we built it on InfoSphere Streams."
"The one thing that we struggled with predominately was support. Because it was relatively new, support was always a big issue and I think it's still a bit of an ongoing concern with the team currently managing it."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there is a lot of things that need to improve."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"The UI was not interactive: Responses used to be very slow and hang up at times."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 2nd in Hadoop with 47 reviews while IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Hadoop. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] writes "The BIQSQL implementation is fully SQL ANSI compliant, but I have found a lot of issues in Fluid Query". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
