"The solution offers great features."
"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."
"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost."
"The stability is good and keeps getting better with each new update."
"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."
"Zimbra Collaboration's best feature is its compatibility with Microsoft's ActiveSync protocol, which allows users to use Outlook on Windows or MacOS."
"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."
"Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution."
"The most valuable feature of Zimbra for our team's productivity is its efficiency in handling email communication."
"NVMe support is lacking when it comes to performance on the disk side."
"The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved."
"The tool should improve its multi-cloud feature."
"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."
"Zimbra should provide a desktop client. Right now, we are using a web browser for accessing our emails. There should also be a desktop client."
"Zimbra Collaboration's video conferencing could be improved."
"The product must be more customizable."
"The installation is not straightforward, it can take two days for the full implementation."
"It is good and competent, but you have to pay for video and group chat features."
CodeTwo Exchange Rules is ranked 3rd in Email Signature Software while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 4th in Email Applications with 27 reviews. CodeTwo Exchange Rules is rated 9.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CodeTwo Exchange Rules writes "Great features that enabled us to reduce hardware at our on-prem sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "Provides good email capability; lacking in security and performance". CodeTwo Exchange Rules is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online and Exclaimer Signature Manager, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Open-Xchange, IceWarp, Google Workspace and KerioConnect.
We monitor all Email Signature Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.